LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L
LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and CSUK.L (iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUK.L returned 10.73%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for CSUK.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LCUK.L charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CSUK.L.
Performance
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCUK.L is traded in GBP, while CSUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSUK.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCUK.L having a 6.81% return and CSUK.L slightly higher at 6.98%.
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUK.L
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 22.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 6.81% | 24.84% | 9.06% | 7.19% | 2.22% | 18.01% | -11.80% | 18.71% | -4.60% |
CSUK.L iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.98% | 25.26% | 8.91% | 6.86% | 7.23% | 18.18% | -13.09% | 16.20% | -5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUK.L and CSUK.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between LCUK.L and CSUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Industrials
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Consumer Defensive
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Healthcare
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Energy
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Basic Materials
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Utilities
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Communication Services
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Real Estate
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Technology
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCUK.L
CSUK.L
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCUK.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.54 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 8.52 | -0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUK.L drawdown since its inception was -35.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUK.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUK.L and CSUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUK.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.53% | -34.55% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -8.91% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.63% | -12.65% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.63% | -12.65% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -3.27% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -4.55% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.66% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) is 2.69%, while iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that LCUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUK.L | CSUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 3.19% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 9.92% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 11.46% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 12.76% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 14.99% | +0.56% |
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUK.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUK.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCUK.L vs. CSUK.L - Dividend Comparison
LCUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while CSUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUK.L iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.93% | 3.87% | 2.99% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, LCUK.L and CSUK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUK.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for LCUK.L and 0.33% for CSUK.L.
Find the right allocation for LCUK.L and CSUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer