LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCUJ.DE (Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and XMEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan, while XMEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUJ.DE returned 10.17%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for XMEM.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCUJ.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMEM.L.

Performance

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LCUJ.DE is traded in EUR, while XMEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMEM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUJ.DE achieves a 17.36% return, which is significantly lower than XMEM.L's 27.12% return.

LCUJ.DE

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 17.36%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 31.24%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: —

XMEM.L

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: 5.99%
• YTD: 27.12%
• 6M: 29.28%
• 1Y: 49.67%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCUJ.DE Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	17.36%	12.70%	13.58%	16.52%	-12.48%	10.04%	5.10%	22.43%	-7.06%
XMEM.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C	27.12%	18.24%	14.24%	5.16%	-15.30%	4.31%	7.54%	20.62%	-12.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018	0.50

The correlation between LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUJ.DE

LCUJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LCUJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LCUJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LCUJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LCUJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

XMEM.L

XMEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
XMEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XMEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XMEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XMEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCUJ.DE	XMEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.77	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	3.72	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.50	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	4.60	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	16.59	-6.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the XMEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCUJ.DE	XMEM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	2.77	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.51	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.24	+0.28

Drawdowns

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, smaller than the maximum XMEM.L drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUJ.DE	XMEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.01%	-60.05%	+32.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-10.75%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-17.93%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.10%	-24.05%	+4.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.61%	+2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-13.63%	+7.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.99%	+0.14%

Volatility

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) is 4.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that LCUJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUJ.DE	XMEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	7.47%	-3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	14.96%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	17.84%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.49%	-0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	18.79%	-1.69%

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMEM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCUJ.DE vs. XMEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCUJ.DE nor XMEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L in my portfolio?

LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCUJ.DE or XMEM.L?

On fees, LCUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCUJ.DE or XMEM.L?

LCUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMEM.L.

What is the main difference between LCUJ.DE and XMEM.L?

LCUJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XMEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. LCUJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while XMEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUJ.DE and 0.49% for XMEM.L.