LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE
LCUJ.DE (Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and VJPA.DE (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Japan Equities funds - LCUJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan while VJPA.DE tracks the FTSE Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUJ.DE returned 10.17%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for VJPA.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LCUJ.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPA.DE.
Performance
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LCUJ.DE having a 17.36% return and VJPA.DE slightly lower at 16.61%.
LCUJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.31%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPA.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 16.61%
- 6M
- 16.99%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUJ.DE Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 17.36% | 12.70% | 13.58% | 16.52% | -12.48% | 4.04% |
VJPA.DE Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.61% | 13.28% | 13.06% | 15.86% | -11.63% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUJ.DE and VJPA.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between LCUJ.DE and VJPA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LCUJ.DE
VJPA.DE
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUJ.DE | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.09 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 10.36 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUJ.DE | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.68 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, which is greater than VJPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUJ.DE and VJPA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUJ.DE | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.01% | -18.92% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -9.85% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -16.01% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.10% | -18.92% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -5.81% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.95% | +0.18% |
Volatility
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE) at 3.34%. This indicates that LCUJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUJ.DE | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.34% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 14.61% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 18.16% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.16% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 16.16% | +0.94% |
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCUJ.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCUJ.DE nor VJPA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LCUJ.DE and VJPA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LCUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPA.DE.
LCUJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while VJPA.DE tracks FTSE Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUJ.DE and 0.15% for VJPA.DE.
Find the right allocation for LCUJ.DE and VJPA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer