PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTRX vs. SAMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund (SAMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTRX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than SAMFX's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LCTRX has outperformed SAMFX with an annualized return of 4.83%, while SAMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.33% annualized return.


LCTRX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.83%

SAMFX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.28%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
1.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.78%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%
SAMFX
Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund
0.13%6.87%0.43%4.35%-13.57%-1.44%10.24%7.12%-0.32%2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTRX and SAMFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010

0.12

Over the past year, LCTRX and SAMFX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTRX vs. SAMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMFX
SAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund (SAMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTRXSAMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.92

1.23

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

1.65

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.19

5.17

+12.03

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the SAMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTRX and SAMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTRXSAMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.29

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.22

-0.08

+2.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.27

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.57

+0.13

Drawdowns

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTRX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, which is greater than SAMFX's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTRX and SAMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTRXSAMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-18.72%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-3.09%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.33%

-6.48%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.82%

-17.95%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

-18.72%

-5.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-5.06%

+4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-3.51%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.98%

-0.70%

Volatility

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) is 0.59%, while Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund (SAMFX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that LCTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTRXSAMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

1.42%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

2.82%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

3.95%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.44%

5.87%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

4.89%

+1.42%

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTRX has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMFX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCTRX vs. SAMFX - Dividend Comparison

LCTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than SAMFX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.28%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%
SAMFX
Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund
4.22%4.25%3.57%3.16%3.33%1.09%1.99%1.95%2.09%2.36%3.59%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTRX and SAMFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMFX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to LCTRX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTRX dropped -26.09% vs SAMFX's -18.72%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTRX and SAMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer