PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTRX vs. ARINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTRX achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than ARINX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, LCTRX has outperformed ARINX with an annualized return of 4.90%, while ARINX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.


LCTRX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.33%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
4.90%

ARINX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.91%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.96%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
0.86%4.42%4.90%3.99%-6.84%1.52%4.29%6.19%0.35%3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTRX and ARINX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2011

0.23

The correlation between LCTRX and ARINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (5 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTRX vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ARINX
ARINX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ARINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ARINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCTRXARINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.40

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.28

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.23

7.52

+10.71

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the ARINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTRX and ARINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTRX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, which is greater than ARINX's maximum drawdown of -9.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTRX and ARINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTRXARINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-9.38%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-1.57%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.33%

-1.57%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.82%

-9.38%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

-9.38%

-14.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.35%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-1.72%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.48%

-0.20%

Volatility

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison

Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.62%. This indicates that LCTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTRXARINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.62%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

1.50%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

1.81%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.26%

2.08%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

1.97%

+4.33%

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTRX has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ARINX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCTRX vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison

LCTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than ARINX's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARINX
Archer Income Fund
3.57%2.72%3.77%3.15%2.72%2.56%2.66%2.69%2.84%2.94%2.84%2.79%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.27%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTRX and ARINX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCTRX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to ARINX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTRX dropped -26.09% vs ARINX's -9.38%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTRX and ARINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer