LCSSX vs. TGFRX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX).

LCSSX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. TGFRX is managed by Tanaka. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998.

Performance

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund	-10.67%	7.26%	21.54%	24.25%	-33.06%	20.27%	58.86%	33.60%	10.56%	39.04%
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund	-3.59%	39.56%	17.98%	50.24%	-22.62%	26.54%	50.87%	18.78%	-25.18%	7.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCSSX achieves a -10.67% return, which is significantly lower than TGFRX's -3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LCSSX has outperformed TGFRX with an annualized return of 15.67%, while TGFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.08% annualized return.

LCSSX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -8.33%
• YTD: -10.67%
• 6M: -12.76%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: 1.92%
• 10Y*: 15.67%

TGFRX

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -9.89%
• YTD: -3.59%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 26.15%
• 3Y*: 28.80%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 13.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCSSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TGFRX's 2.19% expense ratio.

TGFRX

Tanaka Growth Fund

LCSSX

ClearBridge Select Fund

Return for Risk

LCSSX vs. TGFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCSSX

LCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
LCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
LCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
LCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
LCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

TGFRX

TGFRX Risk / Return Rank: 74
TGFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TGFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TGFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TGFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TGFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCSSX	TGFRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	1.31	-1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.02	-1.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.26	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	2.24	-2.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.71	5.75	-5.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the TGFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCSSX and TGFRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCSSX	TGFRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	1.31	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.01	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.02	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.02	+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between LCSSX and TGFRX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Dividend Comparison

LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.51%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	1.28%	2.11%	1.12%	5.25%
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund	13.51%	13.02%	6.89%	0.00%	0.11%	7.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCSSX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum TGFRX drawdown of -95.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSSX and TGFRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCSSX	TGFRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.46%	-95.35%	+51.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.24%	-16.01%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.46%	-95.35%	+51.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.46%	-95.35%	+51.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.24%	-92.80%	+78.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.26%	-31.67%	+22.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	7.21%	-2.87%

Volatility

LCSSX vs. TGFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) is 5.54%, while Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that LCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCSSX	TGFRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	11.19%	-5.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.39%	23.73%	-12.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.32%	34.96%	-14.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.82%	793.45%	-771.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.91%	561.16%	-539.25%