LCSSX vs. MMGPX
LCSSX (ClearBridge Select Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LCSSX returned 2.81%/yr vs -7.25%/yr for MMGPX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCSSX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCSSX achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.33% return.
LCSSX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 3.42% | 7.26% | 21.54% | 24.25% | -33.06% | 20.27% | 58.86% | 33.60% | 10.56% | 28.39% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCSSX and MMGPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between LCSSX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCSSX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
LCSSX
MMGPX
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCSSX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | -0.20 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -0.40 | +3.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCSSX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSSX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCSSX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -75.38% | +31.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.24% | -27.79% | +13.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.67% | -29.27% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.46% | -72.70% | +29.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -41.64% | +39.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -30.29% | +21.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 13.62% | -8.99% |
Volatility
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) is 4.97%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that LCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCSSX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 9.77% | -4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 21.75% | -9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 28.61% | -13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 39.83% | -18.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 35.22% | -13.29% |
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCSSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSSX ClearBridge Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 2.11% | 1.12% | 5.25% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCSSX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to LCSSX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCSSX dropped -43.46% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
LCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCSSX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer