PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCSSX vs. MMGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCSSX achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.33% return.


LCSSX

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.21%
YTD
3.42%
6M
1.97%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
17.23%

MMGPX

1D
-1.11%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-2.33%
6M
-5.94%
1Y
-6.55%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
-7.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCSSX
ClearBridge Select Fund
3.42%7.26%21.54%24.25%-33.06%20.27%58.86%33.60%10.56%28.39%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
-2.33%12.58%41.83%44.34%-63.37%-11.55%152.67%40.20%10.89%28.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LCSSX and MMGPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.84

The correlation between LCSSX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCSSX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCSSX
LCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
LCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MMGPX
MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCSSXMMGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.99

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

-0.20

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

-0.40

+3.28

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCSSX and MMGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCSSX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSSX and MMGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCSSXMMGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-75.38%

+31.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-27.79%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.67%

-29.27%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.46%

-72.70%

+29.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-41.64%

+39.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-30.29%

+21.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

13.62%

-8.99%

Volatility

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Select Fund (LCSSX) is 4.97%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that LCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCSSXMMGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

9.77%

-4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

21.75%

-9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

28.61%

-13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

39.83%

-18.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

35.22%

-13.29%

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCSSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCSSX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

LCSSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCSSX
ClearBridge Select Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%3.26%0.00%0.00%1.28%2.11%1.12%5.25%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
0.44%0.43%0.00%0.00%125.40%64.53%7.93%15.63%28.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCSSX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to LCSSX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCSSX dropped -43.46% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.

LCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCSSX and MMGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer