LCSMX vs. FQEMX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX).

LCSMX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Jan 9, 2018. FQEMX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Nov 21, 2021.

Performance

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	11.23%	51.52%	-13.60%	16.26%	-27.25%	-2.18%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	12.06%	55.98%	6.67%	12.18%	-20.68%	0.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCSMX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 12.06% return.

LCSMX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -12.34%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 26.19%
• 1Y: 63.67%
• 3Y*: 17.07%
• 5Y*: 4.71%
• 10Y*: —

FQEMX

• 1D: 3.12%
• 1M: -15.56%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 27.82%
• 1Y: 70.93%
• 3Y*: 25.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCSMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

LCSMX

Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund

FQEMX

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM

Return for Risk

LCSMX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCSMX

LCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 97
LCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FQEMX

FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCSMX	FQEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	3.07	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.44	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.55	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	3.47	+0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.92	13.65	+3.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCSMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCSMX and FQEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCSMX	FQEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	3.07	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.62	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between LCSMX and FQEMX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

LCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FQEMX's 2.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	0.90%	1.00%	1.29%	1.22%	1.11%	3.03%	0.48%	0.88%	1.40%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	2.84%	3.18%	3.15%	4.82%	3.93%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSMX and FQEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCSMX	FQEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-34.46%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.39%	-18.93%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.80%	-16.40%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.97%	-11.08%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	4.81%	-1.07%

Volatility

LCSMX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) is 12.00%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 14.20%. This indicates that LCSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCSMX	FQEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	14.20%	-2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.91%	20.17%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.02%	24.14%	-2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.90%	19.73%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	19.73%	-0.38%