LCSMX vs. FCEEX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LCSMX (Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund) and FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, LCSMX returned 11.55%/yr vs 9.78%/yr for FCEEX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCSMX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FCEEX.

Performance

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCSMX achieves a 63.33% return, which is significantly higher than FCEEX's 28.50% return.

LCSMX

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: 8.58%
• YTD: 63.33%
• 6M: 70.26%
• 1Y: 122.05%
• 3Y*: 30.97%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: —

FCEEX

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 28.50%
• 6M: 29.88%
• 1Y: 53.70%
• 3Y*: 27.30%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	63.33%	51.52%	-13.60%	16.26%	-27.25%	4.73%	35.72%	11.39%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	28.50%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	10.19%	9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LCSMX and FCEEX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.82

The correlation between LCSMX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCSMX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCSMX

LCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 97
LCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCSMX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.89	3.07	+1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.23	3.94	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.84	1.56	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.08	4.22	+3.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.36	16.78	+14.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCSMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.89, which is higher than the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCSMX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCSMX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.89	3.07	+1.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.58	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.66	-0.01

Drawdowns

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSMX and FCEEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCSMX	FCEEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-34.68%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.39%	-12.98%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	-15.47%	-7.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.72%	-33.59%	-6.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.77%	-1.75%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-11.24%	-2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	3.25%	+0.71%

Volatility

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) at 7.89%. This indicates that LCSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCSMX	FCEEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.49%	7.89%	+5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.84%	15.15%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.44%	17.92%	+7.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.27%	16.96%	+2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.03%	18.37%	+1.66%

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCSMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCSMX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

LCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than FCEEX's 2.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.29%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%	0.00%
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	0.61%	1.00%	1.29%	1.22%	1.11%	3.03%	0.48%	0.88%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCSMX and FCEEX in my portfolio?

LCSMX and FCEEX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCSMX or FCEEX?

LCSMX has higher volatility (13.49%) compared to FCEEX (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCSMX dropped -39.72% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.