LCSIX vs. SVARX
LCSIX (LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund) and SVARX (Spectrum Low Volatility Fund) are both mutual funds - LCSIX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by LoCorr Funds, while SVARX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 10 years, LCSIX returned 2.61%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for SVARX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 2.34%/yr for SVARX.
Performance
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCSIX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than SVARX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LCSIX has underperformed SVARX with an annualized return of 2.61%, while SVARX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.92% annualized return.
LCSIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- -0.89%
- 3Y*
- -2.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.15%
SVARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.81%
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 0.58% | 1.13% | -8.29% | -3.07% | 6.04% | 14.90% | 9.90% | -5.97% | 15.16% | 6.19% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 0.93% | 6.22% | 2.60% | 9.67% | -4.35% | 4.10% | 19.50% | 9.42% | -0.99% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCSIX and SVARX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2013 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, LCSIX and SVARX have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCSIX vs. SVARX — Risk / Return Rank
LCSIX
SVARX
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCSIX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.41 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.01 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 4.26 | -4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCSIX drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, which is greater than SVARX's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSIX and SVARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCSIX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -6.48% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -2.55% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.60% | -2.55% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | -6.48% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.54% | -6.48% | -7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.70% | -1.85% | -8.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -1.23% | -5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.20% | +1.03% |
Volatility
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Volatility Comparison
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) at 0.56%. This indicates that LCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCSIX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 0.56% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.70% | 2.17% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.91% | 2.62% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 3.08% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 3.60% | +3.05% |
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SVARX's 2.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCSIX vs. SVARX - Dividend Comparison
LCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than SVARX's 5.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.30% | 2.32% | 2.75% | 1.88% | 10.75% | 7.14% | 2.94% | 0.54% | 12.36% | 0.02% | 3.21% | 7.36% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 5.89% | 5.95% | 9.35% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 5.85% | 0.71% | 4.91% | 2.41% | 6.90% | 9.07% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCSIX and SVARX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCSIX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to SVARX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCSIX dropped -25.13% vs SVARX's -6.48%.
SVARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCSIX and SVARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer