LCSIX vs. EQCHX
LCSIX (LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund) and EQCHX (AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I) are both Systematic Trend funds. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for EQCHX.
Performance
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCSIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 2.66%
- 3Y*
- -2.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
EQCHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.44% | 1.13% | -8.29% | -3.07% | 6.04% | 14.90% | 9.90% | -5.97% | 15.16% | 6.19% |
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I | 0.83% | -8.09% | -3.79% | -8.07% | 20.13% | 12.28% | 6.96% | -2.56% | -12.91% | 15.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCSIX and EQCHX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2012 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCSIX vs. EQCHX — Risk / Return Rank
LCSIX
EQCHX
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCSIX | EQCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCSIX | EQCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCSIX | EQCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.05% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCSIX | EQCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.20% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.50% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | — | — |
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EQCHX's 1.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCSIX vs. EQCHX - Dividend Comparison
LCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while EQCHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.82% | 1.54% | 20.40% | 0.00% | 3.86% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.34% |
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.26% | 2.32% | 2.75% | 1.88% | 10.75% | 7.14% | 2.94% | 0.54% | 12.36% | 0.02% | 3.21% | 7.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCSIX and EQCHX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LCSIX and EQCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer