LCPE.L vs. UD03.L
LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) and UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCPE.L returned 9.55%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for UD03.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCPE.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD03.L.
Performance
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than UD03.L's 11.99% return.
LCPE.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
UD03.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 13.75% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 2.69% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 11.99% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCPE.L and UD03.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, LCPE.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Healthcare
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Basic Materials
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Industrials
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Technology
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Communication Services
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Energy
LCPE.L
UD03.L
Real Estate
LCPE.L
UD03.L
-
Financial Services
LCPE.L
-
UD03.L
Utilities
LCPE.L
-
UD03.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCPE.L
UD03.L
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCPE.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.61 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 5.67 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 16.11 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCPE.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 3.44 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.74 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.19 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and UD03.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCPE.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -30.85% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -9.80% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -11.72% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.39% | -18.67% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -1.45% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.32% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.56% | -1.55% |
Volatility
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCPE.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 3.69% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 16.20% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 27.51% | -9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 47.36% | -26.75% |
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison
LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.55% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCPE.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.
Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and UD03.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer