PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCPE.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than UD03.L's 11.99% return.


LCPE.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.51%
YTD
13.75%
6M
14.34%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
10.12%

UD03.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.74%
YTD
11.99%
6M
14.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
13.75%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%2.69%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
11.99%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LCPE.L and UD03.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019

0.21

Over the past year, LCPE.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCPE.L
UD03.L

Consumer Defensive

32.8%
14.6%

Healthcare

32.6%
4.1%

Basic Materials

32.3%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
7.0%

Industrials

0.2%
12.1%

Technology

0.2%
16.2%

Communication Services

0.0%
3.1%

Energy

0.0%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

-

28.5%

Utilities

-

7.7%

Consumer Defensive

LCPE.L
32.8%
UD03.L
14.6%

Healthcare

LCPE.L
32.6%
UD03.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

LCPE.L
32.3%
UD03.L
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LCPE.L
1.9%
UD03.L
7.0%

Industrials

LCPE.L
0.2%
UD03.L
12.1%

Technology

LCPE.L
0.2%
UD03.L
16.2%

Communication Services

LCPE.L
0.0%
UD03.L
3.1%

Energy

LCPE.L
0.0%
UD03.L
2.7%

Real Estate

LCPE.L
0.0%
UD03.L

-

Financial Services

LCPE.L

-

UD03.L
28.5%

Utilities

LCPE.L

-

UD03.L
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCPE.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.61

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

5.67

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

16.11

-2.08

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCPE.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCPE.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

3.44

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.74

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.19

-0.21

Drawdowns

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCPE.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.05%

-30.85%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-9.80%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-11.72%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.39%

-18.67%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-1.45%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-3.32%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.56%

-1.55%

Volatility

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCPE.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.69%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

16.20%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

27.51%

-9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

47.36%

-26.75%

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCPE.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.55%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCPE.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer