LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L
LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) and SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L returned 10.12%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for SPOL.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCPE.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for SPOL.L.
Performance
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 14.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCPE.L having a 10.12% annualized return and SPOL.L not far ahead at 10.37%.
LCPE.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
SPOL.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 44.16%
- 3Y*
- 30.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 13.75% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.98% | 61.27% | -4.98% | 41.52% | -17.96% | 8.30% | -14.19% | -9.68% | -7.69% | 40.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCPE.L and SPOL.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.29 |
The correlation between LCPE.L and SPOL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (10 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Healthcare
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
-
Basic Materials
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Industrials
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Technology
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Communication Services
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Energy
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
Real Estate
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
-
Financial Services
LCPE.L
-
SPOL.L
Utilities
LCPE.L
-
SPOL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCPE.L
SPOL.L
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCPE.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 4.62 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 11.04 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCPE.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.90 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.55 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | 0.41 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.16 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and SPOL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCPE.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -56.64% | +29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -9.51% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -19.47% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.39% | -46.27% | +33.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.05% | -56.64% | +29.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -1.16% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -21.80% | +18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.99% | -1.98% |
Volatility
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.81%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCPE.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 7.20% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 17.30% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 23.18% | -11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 27.10% | -9.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 25.42% | -4.81% |
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCPE.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCPE.L nor SPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCPE.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCPE.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCPE.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.
LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.
Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and SPOL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer