PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than L6EW.L's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L has outperformed L6EW.L with an annualized return of 10.12%, while L6EW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.45% annualized return.


LCPE.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.51%
YTD
13.75%
6M
14.34%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
10.12%

L6EW.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.49%
YTD
4.12%
6M
7.14%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
13.75%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%
L6EW.L
Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS
4.12%23.27%-0.27%12.61%-13.76%13.55%7.30%21.13%-10.91%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LCPE.L and L6EW.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.41

Over the past year, LCPE.L and L6EW.L have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCPE.L
L6EW.L

Consumer Defensive

32.8%
7.7%

Healthcare

32.6%
8.4%

Basic Materials

32.3%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
10.9%

Industrials

0.2%
23.1%

Technology

0.2%
5.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
5.0%

Energy

0.0%
1.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
5.8%

Financial Services

-

19.9%

Utilities

-

5.0%

Consumer Defensive

LCPE.L
32.8%
L6EW.L
7.7%

Healthcare

LCPE.L
32.6%
L6EW.L
8.4%

Basic Materials

LCPE.L
32.3%
L6EW.L
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LCPE.L
1.9%
L6EW.L
10.9%

Industrials

LCPE.L
0.2%
L6EW.L
23.1%

Technology

LCPE.L
0.2%
L6EW.L
5.0%

Communication Services

LCPE.L
0.0%
L6EW.L
5.0%

Energy

LCPE.L
0.0%
L6EW.L
1.5%

Real Estate

LCPE.L
0.0%
L6EW.L
5.8%

Financial Services

LCPE.L

-

L6EW.L
19.9%

Utilities

LCPE.L

-

L6EW.L
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

L6EW.L
L6EW.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
L6EW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCPE.LL6EW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

1.35

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

4.80

+9.22

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the L6EW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCPE.L and L6EW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCPE.LL6EW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.25

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.33

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

0.54

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.60

+0.38

Drawdowns

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum L6EW.L drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and L6EW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCPE.LL6EW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.05%

-30.88%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-11.43%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-12.28%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.39%

-26.62%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.05%

-30.88%

+3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-2.45%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-5.51%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.21%

-1.20%

Volatility

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.81%, while Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L6EW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCPE.LL6EW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.03%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

10.32%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

12.35%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

15.24%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

15.61%

+5.00%

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than L6EW.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCPE.L nor L6EW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCPE.L and L6EW.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, L6EW.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

L6EW.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.35% for L6EW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and L6EW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer