LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L
LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) and L6EW.L (Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds from Natixis tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L returned 10.12%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for L6EW.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCPE.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for L6EW.L.
Performance
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than L6EW.L's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LCPE.L has outperformed L6EW.L with an annualized return of 10.12%, while L6EW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.45% annualized return.
LCPE.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
L6EW.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 13.75% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
L6EW.L Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS | 4.12% | 23.27% | -0.27% | 12.61% | -13.76% | 13.55% | 7.30% | 21.13% | -10.91% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCPE.L and L6EW.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, LCPE.L and L6EW.L have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Healthcare
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Basic Materials
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Industrials
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Technology
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Communication Services
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Energy
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Real Estate
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
Financial Services
LCPE.L
-
L6EW.L
Utilities
LCPE.L
-
L6EW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCPE.L
L6EW.L
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCPE.L | L6EW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 1.35 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 4.80 | +9.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCPE.L | L6EW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.25 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.33 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | 0.54 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.60 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum L6EW.L drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and L6EW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCPE.L | L6EW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -30.88% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -11.43% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -12.28% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.39% | -26.62% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.05% | -30.88% | +3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -2.45% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -5.51% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.21% | -1.20% |
Volatility
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) is 3.81%, while Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that LCPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L6EW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCPE.L | L6EW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 4.03% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 10.32% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 12.35% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 15.24% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 15.61% | +5.00% |
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than L6EW.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCPE.L vs. L6EW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCPE.L nor L6EW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCPE.L and L6EW.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, L6EW.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L6EW.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.35% for L6EW.L.
Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and L6EW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer