L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

L6EW.L (Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS) and LEMV.L (Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)) are both Europe Equities funds from Natixis tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, L6EW.L returned 8.45%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for LEMV.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. L6EW.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LEMV.L.

Performance

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L) and Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L6EW.L achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than LEMV.L's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, L6EW.L has outperformed LEMV.L with an annualized return of 8.45%, while LEMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.

L6EW.L

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 7.14%
• 1Y: 15.44%
• 3Y*: 11.10%
• 5Y*: 5.09%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

LEMV.L

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: 11.10%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 7.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
L6EW.L Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS	4.12%	23.27%	-0.27%	12.61%	-13.76%	13.55%	7.30%	21.13%	-10.91%	18.91%
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)	3.75%	17.91%	9.36%	4.61%	-9.18%	15.18%	6.43%	12.42%	-4.04%	16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between L6EW.L and LEMV.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2012	0.82

The correlation between L6EW.L and LEMV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	L6EW.L	LEMV.L
Industrials	23.1%	18.7%
Financial Services	19.9%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	2.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	1.1%
Basic Materials	7.6%	0.4%
Real Estate	5.8%	11.6%
Communication Services	5.0%	16.5%
Technology	5.0%	9.8%
Utilities	5.0%	20.2%
Energy	1.5%	2.2%

Return for Risk

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L6EW.L

L6EW.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
L6EW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
L6EW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
L6EW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
L6EW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
L6EW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

LEMV.L

LEMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
LEMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
LEMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
LEMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LEMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
LEMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L) and Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	L6EW.L	LEMV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.64	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	0.92	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.12	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	0.71	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	2.43	+2.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L6EW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the LEMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L6EW.L and LEMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	L6EW.L	LEMV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.64	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.58	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.63	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.69	-0.08

Drawdowns

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L6EW.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, which is greater than LEMV.L's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L6EW.L and LEMV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	L6EW.L	LEMV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.88%	-23.95%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-9.17%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.28%	-9.93%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.62%	-17.93%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.88%	-23.95%	-6.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-3.90%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-3.95%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	2.69%	+0.52%

Volatility

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) at 2.82%. This indicates that L6EW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	L6EW.L	LEMV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	2.82%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.32%	8.67%	+1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	10.31%	+2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	11.80%	+3.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.61%	12.49%	+3.12%

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

L6EW.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LEMV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

L6EW.L vs. LEMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither L6EW.L nor LEMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both L6EW.L and LEMV.L in my portfolio?

L6EW.L and LEMV.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, L6EW.L or LEMV.L?

On fees, L6EW.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, L6EW.L or LEMV.L?

L6EW.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LEMV.L.

What is the main difference between L6EW.L and LEMV.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for L6EW.L and 0.45% for LEMV.L.