PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCPE.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCPE.L achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than FLXD.L's 8.75% return.


LCPE.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.51%
YTD
13.75%
6M
14.34%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
10.12%

FLXD.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
8.75%
6M
12.23%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
13.75%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%-3.27%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
8.75%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-11.21%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LCPE.L and FLXD.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.30

Over the past year, LCPE.L and FLXD.L have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCPE.L
FLXD.L

Consumer Defensive

32.8%
4.6%

Healthcare

32.6%
10.3%

Basic Materials

32.3%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
1.0%

Industrials

0.2%
7.9%

Technology

0.2%
0.7%

Communication Services

0.0%
16.3%

Energy

0.0%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

-

35.8%

Utilities

-

3.1%

Consumer Defensive

LCPE.L
32.8%
FLXD.L
4.6%

Healthcare

LCPE.L
32.6%
FLXD.L
10.3%

Basic Materials

LCPE.L
32.3%
FLXD.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LCPE.L
1.9%
FLXD.L
1.0%

Industrials

LCPE.L
0.2%
FLXD.L
7.9%

Technology

LCPE.L
0.2%
FLXD.L
0.7%

Communication Services

LCPE.L
0.0%
FLXD.L
16.3%

Energy

LCPE.L
0.0%
FLXD.L
11.6%

Real Estate

LCPE.L
0.0%
FLXD.L
3.5%

Financial Services

LCPE.L

-

FLXD.L
35.8%

Utilities

LCPE.L

-

FLXD.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCPE.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

5.58

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

15.69

-1.67

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCPE.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCPE.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.20

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.63

+0.35

Drawdowns

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCPE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.05%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCPE.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCPE.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.05%

-29.71%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-3.62%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-7.78%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.39%

-11.76%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-3.24%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-4.13%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.29%

+0.72%

Volatility

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that LCPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCPE.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.68%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

6.94%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

8.54%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

10.85%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

12.92%

+7.69%

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCPE.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCPE.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.39%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCPE.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LCPE.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCPE.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer