PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LCJP.L having a 16.47% return and VJPN.L slightly lower at 16.32%.


LCJP.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.27%
YTD
16.47%
6M
15.66%
1Y
34.33%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*

VJPN.L

1D
0.70%
1M
6.43%
YTD
16.32%
6M
16.26%
1Y
35.06%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCJP.L
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
16.47%17.61%8.90%14.05%-7.13%2.24%12.26%14.63%-4.50%
VJPN.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
16.32%18.86%9.05%14.00%-5.70%2.26%12.84%14.56%-4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LCJP.L and VJPN.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.99

The correlation between LCJP.L and VJPN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCJP.L
VJPN.L

Industrials

26.0%
26.6%

Technology

19.1%
17.4%

Financial Services

17.5%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
12.8%

Communication Services

7.9%
7.1%

Healthcare

6.3%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
3.4%

Utilities

1.1%
1.3%

Energy

1.1%
1.0%

Industrials

LCJP.L
26.0%
VJPN.L
26.6%

Technology

LCJP.L
19.1%
VJPN.L
17.4%

Financial Services

LCJP.L
17.5%
VJPN.L
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LCJP.L
12.1%
VJPN.L
12.8%

Communication Services

LCJP.L
7.9%
VJPN.L
7.1%

Healthcare

LCJP.L
6.3%
VJPN.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

LCJP.L
3.6%
VJPN.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

LCJP.L
3.0%
VJPN.L
4.3%

Real Estate

LCJP.L
2.3%
VJPN.L
3.4%

Utilities

LCJP.L
1.1%
VJPN.L
1.3%

Energy

LCJP.L
1.1%
VJPN.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCJP.L
LCJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPN.L
VJPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VJPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCJP.LVJPN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.20

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

10.40

-0.16

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VJPN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCJP.L and VJPN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCJP.LVJPN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.91

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.69

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.62

-0.11

Drawdowns

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, which is greater than VJPN.L's maximum drawdown of -25.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and VJPN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCJP.LVJPN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.61%

-25.19%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-10.68%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-13.45%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-17.91%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-5.26%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.29%

+0.05%

Volatility

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCJP.LVJPN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.85%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

14.62%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

17.91%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.50%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

15.90%

+0.92%

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPN.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCJP.L vs. VJPN.L - Dividend Comparison

LCJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCJP.L
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VJPN.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
2.23%2.54%2.47%2.39%2.64%2.31%2.14%2.36%2.55%1.94%2.04%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LCJP.L and VJPN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LCJP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCJP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPN.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCJP.L and 0.15% for VJPN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCJP.L and VJPN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer