LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L).
LCJP.L and LGJG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCJP.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. LGJG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. Both LCJP.L and LGJG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCJP.L Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 9.07% | 17.61% | 8.90% | 14.05% | -7.13% | 2.24% | 12.26% | 11.02% |
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 7.40% | 17.46% | 10.01% | 13.64% | -6.84% | 1.78% | 13.24% | 11.39% |
Different Trading Currencies
LCJP.L is traded in GBP, while LGJG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGJG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCJP.L achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than LGJG.L's 7.40% return.
LCJP.L
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 30.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
LGJG.L
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCJP.L
LGJG.L
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.54 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.16 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.64 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 9.71 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCJP.L and LGJG.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCJP.L nor LGJG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, which is greater than LGJG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and LGJG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.61% | -22.92% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -11.04% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -18.20% | -0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -5.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -5.19% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.00% | 0.00% |
Volatility
LCJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) at 8.25%. This indicates that LCJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGJG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 8.25% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 14.06% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 18.67% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 15.49% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 16.78% | -0.01% |