LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L
LCJP.L (Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LCJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCJP.L returned 10.26%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for MEUD.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCJP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.
Performance
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCJP.L is traded in GBP, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCJP.L achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 6.58% return.
LCJP.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 16.47%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 34.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCJP.L Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 16.47% | 17.61% | 8.90% | 14.05% | -7.13% | 2.24% | 12.26% | 14.63% | -4.50% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.58% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCJP.L and MEUD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between LCJP.L and MEUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Technology
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Financial Services
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Communication Services
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Healthcare
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Consumer Defensive
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Basic Materials
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Real Estate
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Utilities
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Energy
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCJP.L
MEUD.L
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCJP.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 1.85 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 6.70 | +3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCJP.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.60 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.71 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.60 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and MEUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCJP.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.61% | -28.57% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -10.53% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -12.61% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -17.09% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.33% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -4.16% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.91% | +0.43% |
Volatility
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) is 3.73%, while Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that LCJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCJP.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.14% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 10.20% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 12.14% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 13.94% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 14.92% | +1.90% |
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCJP.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCJP.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCJP.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCJP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCJP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MEUD.L.
LCJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. LCJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCJP.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.
Find the right allocation for LCJP.L and MEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer