PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCJP.L is traded in GBP, while LGJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCJP.L having a 12.39% return and LGJP.L slightly higher at 12.60%.


LCJP.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
-6.06%
6M
5.57%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*

LGJP.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
-5.49%
6M
5.89%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCJP.L
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
12.39%17.56%8.90%14.09%-7.13%2.24%12.26%14.63%-5.42%
LGJP.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.60%16.72%10.25%14.24%-6.86%2.01%13.16%14.08%-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LCJP.L and LGJP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.93

The correlation between LCJP.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCJP.L
LCJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJP.L
LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCJP.LLGJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.72

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

8.34

+0.02

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCJP.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than LGJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and LGJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCJP.LLGJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.46%

-23.10%

-76.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-10.76%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-13.79%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-18.15%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.76%

-6.88%

-91.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-98.44%

-4.98%

-93.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.51%

+0.06%

Volatility

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGJP.L) have volatilities of 6.55% and 6.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCJP.LLGJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

6.47%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

17.01%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.89%

20.11%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

16.82%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.24%

17.44%

+20.80%

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCJP.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LCJP.L and LGJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCJP.L.

LCJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while LGJP.L tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCJP.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCJP.L and LGJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer