LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCJP.L (Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and JRIE.L (JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Amundi and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCJP.L returned 15.67%/yr vs 17.01%/yr for JRIE.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCJP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JRIE.L.

Performance

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LCJP.L is traded in GBP, while JRIE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRIE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCJP.L having a 16.47% return and JRIE.L slightly higher at 16.88%.

LCJP.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 6.27%
• YTD: 16.47%
• 6M: 15.66%
• 1Y: 34.33%
• 3Y*: 15.67%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: —

JRIE.L

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 6.24%
• YTD: 16.88%
• 6M: 15.92%
• 1Y: 34.73%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCJP.L Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	16.47%	17.61%	8.90%	14.05%	6.36%
JRIE.L JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)	16.88%	14.41%	12.30%	14.34%	4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LCJP.L and JRIE.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022	0.27

The correlation between LCJP.L and JRIE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCJP.L

LCJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
LCJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LCJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
LCJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LCJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

JRIE.L

JRIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
JRIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JRIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
JRIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JRIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JRIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCJP.L	JRIE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	4.92	-3.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	5.71	-3.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.84	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	16.64	-13.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	46.46	-36.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the JRIE.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCJP.L and JRIE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCJP.L	JRIE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	4.92	-3.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	3.80	-3.28

Drawdowns

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, which is greater than JRIE.L's maximum drawdown of -13.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and JRIE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCJP.L	JRIE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.61%	-13.10%	-13.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-10.14%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.62%	-13.10%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-0.38%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-2.88%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	—	—

Volatility

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRIE.L) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCJP.L	JRIE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	3.86%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.58%	34.53%	-15.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	35.66%	-19.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	35.66%	-18.84%

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JRIE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCJP.L vs. JRIE.L - Dividend Comparison

LCJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRIE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JRIE.L JPMorgan Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)	1.52%	1.81%	1.53%	1.72%	2.14%
LCJP.L Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCJP.L and JRIE.L in my portfolio?

LCJP.L and JRIE.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCJP.L or JRIE.L?

On fees, LCJP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCJP.L or JRIE.L?

LCJP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRIE.L.

What is the main difference between LCJP.L and JRIE.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCJP.L and 0.25% for JRIE.L.