LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

LCJP.L (Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and JPNL.L (Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR) are both Japan Equities funds from Amundi tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCJP.L returned 10.37%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for JPNL.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LCJP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for JPNL.L.

Performance

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LCJP.L is traded in GBP, while JPNL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPNL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCJP.L achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than JPNL.L's 16.19% return.

LCJP.L

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: —

JPNL.L

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 16.19%
• 6M: 16.37%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: 16.67%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCJP.L Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	18.20%	17.56%	8.90%	14.09%	-7.13%	2.24%	12.26%	14.63%	-99.38%
JPNL.L Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR	16.19%	17.96%	7.75%	13.02%	-5.78%	0.85%	10.24%	13.26%	-9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LCJP.L and JPNL.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018	0.97

The correlation between LCJP.L and JPNL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCJP.L	JPNL.L
Industrials	24.4%	25.4%
Technology	21.1%	18.7%
Financial Services	17.4%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	12.1%
Communication Services	8.9%	8.0%
Healthcare	5.8%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	4.2%
Basic Materials	3.0%	4.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Utilities	1.0%	1.2%
Energy	0.9%	0.9%

Return for Risk

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCJP.L

LCJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LCJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
LCJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LCJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LCJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

JPNL.L

JPNL.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
JPNL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JPNL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
JPNL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
JPNL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCJP.L	JPNL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.90	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.63	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.36	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	3.20	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.03	10.07	+0.96

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the JPNL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCJP.L and JPNL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than JPNL.L's maximum drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and JPNL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCJP.L	JPNL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.46%	-38.87%	-60.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-10.63%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.59%	-13.44%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.58%	-18.80%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.70%	-2.90%	-95.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-98.44%	-10.52%	-87.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	3.38%	-0.01%

Volatility

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) at 5.37%. This indicates that LCJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPNL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCJP.L	JPNL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	5.37%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.01%	14.82%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.38%	17.93%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	15.49%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.33%	15.80%	+22.53%

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPNL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCJP.L vs. JPNL.L - Dividend Comparison

LCJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPNL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JPNL.L Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR	0.62%	0.71%	0.73%	1.23%	1.83%	1.37%	1.14%	2.01%	1.84%	1.43%	1.97%	1.77%
LCJP.L Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCJP.L and JPNL.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, LCJP.L and JPNL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LCJP.L or JPNL.L?

On fees, LCJP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCJP.L or JPNL.L?

LCJP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.

What is the main difference between LCJP.L and JPNL.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCJP.L and 0.45% for JPNL.L.