PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCJP.L is traded in GBP, while IUVD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUVD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCJP.L achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly lower than IUVD.L's 47.02% return.


LCJP.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.27%
YTD
16.47%
6M
15.66%
1Y
34.33%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*

IUVD.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
16.76%
YTD
47.02%
6M
49.32%
1Y
91.02%
3Y*
30.10%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCJP.L
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
16.47%17.61%8.90%14.05%-7.13%2.24%12.26%14.63%-4.50%
IUVD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
47.02%23.52%8.37%8.83%-4.73%30.86%-4.30%20.86%-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LCJP.L and IUVD.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.55

The correlation between LCJP.L and IUVD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCJP.L
IUVD.L

Industrials

26.0%
7.3%

Technology

19.1%
44.9%

Financial Services

17.5%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

7.9%
8.3%

Healthcare

6.3%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.8%

Utilities

1.1%
1.9%

Energy

1.1%
3.2%

Industrials

LCJP.L
26.0%
IUVD.L
7.3%

Technology

LCJP.L
19.1%
IUVD.L
44.9%

Financial Services

LCJP.L
17.5%
IUVD.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

LCJP.L
12.1%
IUVD.L
8.3%

Communication Services

LCJP.L
7.9%
IUVD.L
8.3%

Healthcare

LCJP.L
6.3%
IUVD.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

LCJP.L
3.6%
IUVD.L
4.0%

Basic Materials

LCJP.L
3.0%
IUVD.L
1.6%

Real Estate

LCJP.L
2.3%
IUVD.L
1.8%

Utilities

LCJP.L
1.1%
IUVD.L
1.9%

Energy

LCJP.L
1.1%
IUVD.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCJP.L
LCJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IUVD.L
IUVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IUVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCJP.LIUVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.94

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

14.23

-11.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

54.63

-44.38

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the IUVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCJP.L and IUVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCJP.LIUVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

5.54

-3.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.00

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.73

-0.22

Drawdowns

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCJP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, smaller than the maximum IUVD.L drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCJP.L and IUVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCJP.LIUVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.61%

-32.23%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-6.36%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-20.35%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-20.35%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.99%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-5.87%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.66%

+1.68%

Volatility

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCJP.L) is 3.73%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUVD.L) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that LCJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCJP.LIUVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

7.25%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

13.28%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

16.35%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

16.99%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

19.20%

-2.38%

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCJP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IUVD.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCJP.L vs. IUVD.L - Dividend Comparison

LCJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IUVD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.12%1.64%2.24%2.27%2.61%1.85%2.26%2.26%1.73%
LCJP.L
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCJP.L and IUVD.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCJP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCJP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUVD.L.

LCJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IUVD.L is Large Cap Value Equities. LCJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IUVD.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCJP.L and 0.20% for IUVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCJP.L and IUVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer