PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCIAX vs. STFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCIAX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than STFGX's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX has outperformed STFGX with an annualized return of 15.25%, while STFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.07% annualized return.


LCIAX

1D
0.19%
1M
5.71%
YTD
11.40%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
15.25%

STFGX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.05%
YTD
12.37%
6M
11.65%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
11.40%17.33%23.90%26.51%-19.27%26.29%20.85%31.37%-5.10%21.59%
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
12.37%19.19%20.85%17.49%-11.27%25.90%15.65%28.02%-5.35%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LCIAX and STFGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.94

The correlation between LCIAX and STFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCIAX vs. STFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCIAX
LCIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LCIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LCIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

STFGX
STFGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
STFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
STFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCIAXSTFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.56

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

4.00

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.30

17.84

-2.55

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the STFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCIAX and STFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCIAXSTFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.99

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.84

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.63

-0.13

Drawdowns

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCIAX drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than STFGX's maximum drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCIAX and STFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIAXSTFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-48.88%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-8.51%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-21.65%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.32%

-21.65%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-31.46%

-3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-7.82%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.89%

+0.01%

Volatility

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) is 2.85%, while State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that LCIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIAXSTFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.22%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.89%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

11.39%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

15.99%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

16.78%

+2.99%

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCIAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than STFGX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCIAX vs. STFGX - Dividend Comparison

LCIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.97%, more than STFGX's 5.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
13.97%15.51%14.83%13.13%16.71%9.30%2.67%18.94%19.92%4.15%3.17%5.35%
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
5.71%6.42%8.96%6.39%0.96%15.49%2.81%3.33%4.11%3.40%3.39%13.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LCIAX and STFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STFGX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to LCIAX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCIAX dropped -57.93% vs STFGX's -48.88%.

STFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCIAX and STFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer