LCGFX vs. BESIX
Compare and contrast key facts about William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX).
LCGFX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. BESIX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Oct 23, 2011.
Performance
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | -15.23% | 11.79% | 26.09% | 40.48% | -32.48% | 28.29% | 36.64% | 36.44% | 5.18% | 31.29% |
BESIX William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund | 3.79% | 13.93% | 8.37% | 22.25% | -27.95% | 15.52% | 32.60% | 20.58% | -23.29% | 40.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCGFX achieves a -15.23% return, which is significantly lower than BESIX's 3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, LCGFX has outperformed BESIX with an annualized return of 14.43%, while BESIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.
LCGFX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- -15.23%
- 6M
- -16.74%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
BESIX
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -10.74%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCGFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BESIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCGFX vs. BESIX — Risk / Return Rank
LCGFX
BESIX
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCGFX | BESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.86 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 2.41 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.84 | -2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 9.98 | -9.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCGFX | BESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.86 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.51 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCGFX and BESIX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Dividend Comparison
LCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than BESIX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | 10.10% | 8.56% | 5.97% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 4.29% | 3.83% | 6.46% | 17.08% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 9.86% |
BESIX William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 4.84% | 8.51% | 0.04% | 0.16% | 2.32% | 3.17% | 2.67% | 4.17% |
Drawdowns
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCGFX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than BESIX's maximum drawdown of -38.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCGFX and BESIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCGFX | BESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -38.05% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.59% | -11.45% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.25% | -31.41% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.25% | -38.05% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -11.45% | -8.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -10.28% | -11.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 3.26% | +3.36% |
Volatility
LCGFX vs. BESIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) is 5.18%, while William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that LCGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCGFX | BESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 8.27% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 13.89% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 17.62% | +4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 14.67% | +7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 16.01% | +5.21% |