LCFYX vs. LLDYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCFYX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund) and LLDYX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LCFYX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LLDYX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LCFYX returned 13.47%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for LLDYX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCFYX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for LLDYX.

Performance

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCFYX achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than LLDYX's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LCFYX has outperformed LLDYX with an annualized return of 13.47%, while LLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.

LCFYX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 22.50%
• 6M: 22.85%
• 1Y: 42.12%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

LLDYX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.21%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: 5.19%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund	22.50%	22.27%	13.91%	7.25%	-23.24%	1.34%	64.36%	24.25%	-5.76%	16.78%
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.78%	6.19%	5.13%	5.41%	-5.35%	1.07%	3.17%	5.64%	1.47%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LCFYX and LLDYX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2004	0.04

Return for Risk

LCFYX vs. LLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCFYX

LCFYX Risk / Return Rank: 87
LCFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LCFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LCFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LCFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LCFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LLDYX

LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCFYX	LLDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	1.86	+1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	3.33	+0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.65	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.11	3.47	+2.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.84	13.96	+8.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCFYX and LLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCFYX	LLDYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	1.86	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.86	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	1.05	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.09	-0.33

Drawdowns

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCFYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than LLDYX's maximum drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCFYX and LLDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCFYX	LLDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-10.54%	-28.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.06%	-1.29%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.16%	-1.29%	-10.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.74%	-7.43%	-23.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.42%	-9.67%	-23.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.26%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.40%	-1.20%	-7.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.32%	+1.57%

Volatility

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) at 0.73%. This indicates that LCFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCFYX	LLDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	0.73%	+4.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	1.68%	+10.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.74%	2.40%	+12.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	2.74%	+10.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.65%	2.59%	+11.06%

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCFYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCFYX vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

LCFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than LLDYX's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund	1.27%	1.88%	2.31%	2.06%	2.73%	18.40%	16.22%	8.76%	4.99%	2.54%	3.72%	3.48%
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	5.16%	5.21%	4.73%	4.71%	2.58%	2.52%	3.06%	3.79%	4.11%	3.90%	4.15%	4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCFYX and LLDYX in my portfolio?

LCFYX and LLDYX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCFYX or LLDYX?

LCFYX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to LLDYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCFYX dropped -39.17% vs LLDYX's -10.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.