PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCFYX vs. CHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCFYX vs. CHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCFYX vs. CHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCFYX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund
3.98%22.27%13.91%7.25%-23.24%1.34%64.36%24.25%-5.76%16.78%
CHI
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
7.61%-2.15%27.23%9.49%-23.31%20.31%33.82%35.66%-12.67%22.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCFYX achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than CHI's 7.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCFYX having a 11.96% annualized return and CHI not far behind at 11.94%.


LCFYX

1D
2.19%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
3.98%
6M
6.14%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
11.96%

CHI

1D
3.26%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
7.61%
6M
8.24%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCFYX vs. CHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCFYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CHI's 0.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LCFYX vs. CHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCFYX
LCFYX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LCFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LCFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CHI
CHI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCFYX vs. CHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCFYXCHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

1.36

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.00

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

2.49

+1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.40

9.85

+4.54

LCFYX vs. CHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the CHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCFYX and CHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCFYXCHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.36

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.24

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.52

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.39

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between LCFYX and CHI is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LCFYX vs. CHI - Dividend Comparison

LCFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than CHI's 10.28% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCFYX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund
1.50%1.88%2.31%2.06%2.73%18.40%16.22%8.76%4.99%2.54%3.72%3.48%
CHI
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
10.28%10.88%9.55%11.00%10.85%7.54%6.75%8.49%12.19%10.19%11.30%11.50%

Drawdowns

LCFYX vs. CHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCFYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum CHI drawdown of -64.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCFYX and CHI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFYXCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-64.72%

+25.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-11.55%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-36.03%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.42%

-49.64%

+16.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.03%

-4.32%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-9.73%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.92%

-0.93%

Volatility

LCFYX vs. CHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) is 6.37%, while Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that LCFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCFYXCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

8.57%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

13.83%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

19.88%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

20.01%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

23.09%

-9.58%