PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF (LCEU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LCEU.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
3.09%
YTD
4.87%
6M
7.28%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
10Y*

CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LCEU.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF
4.87%9.84%5.83%14.59%2.39%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%17.53%5.08%14.19%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between LCEU.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2022

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between LCEU.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCEU.DE
LCEU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LCEU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF (LCEU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCEU.DECEMT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.10

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

4.03

-1.12

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCEU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCEU.DE and CEMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCEU.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.77

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.37

+0.35

Drawdowns

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCEU.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.38%, smaller than the maximum CEMT.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCEU.DE and CEMT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCEU.DECEMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.38%

-37.66%

+21.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-4.26%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.38%

-14.36%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.39%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-7.08%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.16%

+1.97%

Volatility

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF (LCEU.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that LCEU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCEU.DECEMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

0.00%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

0.00%

+10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

6.11%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

14.61%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

16.11%

-2.97%

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCEU.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCEU.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCEU.DE nor CEMT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCEU.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMT.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMT.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCEU.DE.

LCEU.DE tracks Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LCEU.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCEU.DE and CEMT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer