PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAP vs. SIXA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAP vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LCAP having a 13.61% return and SIXA slightly lower at 13.49%.


LCAP

1D
0.78%
1M
3.26%
6M
11.00%
YTD
13.61%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIXA

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.26%
6M
11.49%
YTD
13.49%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAP vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCAP and SIXA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.55

The correlation between LCAP and SIXA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAP vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAP vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCAPSIXADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.20

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

12.13

-1.56

LCAP vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAP and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCAP vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum SIXA drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and SIXA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAPSIXADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-18.38%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-5.59%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-2.95%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

1.47%

+0.89%

Volatility

LCAP vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.35%. This indicates that LCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAPSIXADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

2.35%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

6.94%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

8.89%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

12.78%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

13.28%

+3.48%

LCAP vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCAP vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SIXA's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
0.09%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
2.02%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCAP and SIXA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCAP has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to SIXA (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.78% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 24.93% vs 17.81% for SIXA. On fees, LCAP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 24.93% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LCAP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.09% for LCAP.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAP and SIXA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer