LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L
LCAL.L (Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LCAL.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while FLXK.L is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCAL.L returned 19.36%/yr vs 37.03%/yr for FLXK.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCAL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.
Performance
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCAL.L is traded in GBP, while FLXK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXK.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCAL.L achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 72.16% return.
LCAL.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -10.82%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 32.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXK.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -23.34%
- 6M
- 49.24%
- YTD
- 72.16%
- 1Y
- 136.47%
- 3Y*
- 37.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- —
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAL.L Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc | 18.39% | 24.13% | 13.58% | 1.00% | -34.15% | 34.44% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 72.16% | 80.91% | -20.26% | 14.73% | -19.45% | 4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAL.L and FLXK.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between LCAL.L and FLXK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCAL.L
FLXK.L
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCAL.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 5.03 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 17.21 | -9.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAL.L drawdown since its inception was -43.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAL.L and FLXK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAL.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.47% | -41.70% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.32% | -26.99% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -28.10% | +10.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.32% | -26.99% | +12.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -17.72% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 7.90% | -3.59% |
Volatility
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) is 9.86%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 18.55%. This indicates that LCAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCAL.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 18.55% | -8.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.49% | 40.42% | -20.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 43.95% | -22.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 27.96% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 28.13% | -2.04% |
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCAL.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCAL.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCAL.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCAL.L.
LCAL.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLXK.L is South Korea Equities. LCAL.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCAL.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.
Find the right allocation for LCAL.L and FLXK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer