LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS
LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) and ECMPA.AS (Eurocommercial Properties N.V.) are both stocks. LBS.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ECMPA.AS operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO returned 30.61%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for ECMPA.AS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LBS.TO is traded in CAD, while ECMPA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ECMPA.AS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 92.41% return, which is significantly higher than ECMPA.AS's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO has outperformed ECMPA.AS with an annualized return of 30.61%, while ECMPA.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.56% annualized return.
LBS.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 32.16%
- YTD
- 92.41%
- 6M
- 90.38%
- 1Y
- 162.44%
- 3Y*
- 60.88%
- 5Y*
- 39.30%
- 10Y*
- 30.61%
ECMPA.AS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 13.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 92.41% | 55.41% | 38.56% | 10.41% | 0.97% | 65.80% | -3.16% | 44.97% | -20.15% | 19.78% |
ECMPA.AS Eurocommercial Properties N.V. | 14.42% | 36.65% | 9.61% | 6.34% | 30.31% | 39.11% | -34.63% | -5.01% | -17.20% | 125.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBS.TO and ECMPA.AS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
LBS.TO
ECMPA.AS
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Eurocommercial Properties N.V. (ECMPA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LBS.TO | ECMPA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.13 | +0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 1.05 | +5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.45 | 2.20 | +26.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, which is greater than ECMPA.AS's maximum drawdown of -76.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and ECMPA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBS.TO | ECMPA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.14% | -76.09% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.43% | -12.43% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.23% | -16.44% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | -27.67% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.25% | -76.09% | +12.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.19% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -22.37% | +10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 5.94% | -0.21% |
Volatility
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Volatility Comparison
Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Eurocommercial Properties N.V. (ECMPA.AS) at 5.21%. This indicates that LBS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECMPA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBS.TO | ECMPA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 5.21% | +7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.15% | 15.33% | +26.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.20% | 19.64% | +25.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 27.28% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.24% | 46.42% | -7.18% |
Dividends
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Dividend Comparison
LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, more than ECMPA.AS's 6.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECMPA.AS Eurocommercial Properties N.V. | 6.62% | 6.91% | 7.66% | 7.21% | 6.64% | 2.66% | 0.00% | 9.85% | 9.00% | 6.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 7.21% | 12.92% | 17.12% | 19.61% | 17.88% | 15.33% | 7.16% | 19.39% | 23.12% | 15.52% | 15.92% | 19.20% |
Financials
LBS.TO vs. ECMPA.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life & Banc Split Corp. and Eurocommercial Properties N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LBS.TO and ECMPA.AS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and ECMPA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer