PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LBS.TO vs. CII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LBS.TO vs. CII

Last updated Jun 30, 2026
See Documentation

LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) is a stock, while CII (BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO returned 30.61%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for CII. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LBS.TO vs. CII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LBS.TO is traded in CAD, while CII is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CII values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 92.41% return, which is significantly higher than CII's 17.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO has outperformed CII with an annualized return of 30.61%, while CII has yielded a comparatively lower 16.44% annualized return.

LBS.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
32.16%
YTD
92.41%
6M
90.38%
1Y
162.44%
3Y*
60.88%
5Y*
39.30%
10Y*
30.61%

CII

1D
1.93%
1M
1.13%
YTD
17.04%
6M
18.69%
1Y
47.06%
3Y*
25.81%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
16.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBS.TO vs. CII - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		92.41%55.41%38.56%10.41%0.97%65.80%-3.16%44.97%-20.15%19.78%
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund		17.04%31.49%22.25%15.65%-7.71%34.19%5.55%25.08%-0.92%19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LBS.TO and CII is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2006

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Life & Banc Split Corp.

BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund

Often compared with LBS.TO:
LBS.TO vs. BK.TOLBS.TO vs. SBC.TOLBS.TO vs. DFN.TOLBS.TO vs. FTN.TOLBS.TO vs. LCS.TOLBS.TO vs. VDY.TOLBS.TO vs. BCE.TO
Often compared with CII:
CII vs. SPYICII vs. ECATCII vs. ETYCII vs. BDJCII vs. SCHDCII vs. ARDCCII vs. YGLD.DE

Return for Risk

LBS.TO vs. CII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBS.TO vs. CII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LBS.TOCIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.62
2.92

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.07
3.84

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.49

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.43

3.95

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.45

13.28

+15.16

LBS.TO vs. CII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is comparable to the CII Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBS.TO and CII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBS.TO vs. CII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, which is greater than CII's maximum drawdown of -48.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and CII.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LBS.TOCIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.14%

-48.18%

-34.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.43%

-11.96%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.23%

-21.52%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-21.52%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.25%

-36.35%

-26.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

0.00%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-7.36%

-4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

3.55%

+2.18%

Volatility

LBS.TO vs. CII - Volatility Comparison

Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) at 6.08%. This indicates that LBS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LBS.TOCIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

6.08%

+6.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.15%

12.79%

+29.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.20%

16.21%

+28.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.58%

18.02%

+12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.24%

19.39%

+19.85%

Dividends

LBS.TO vs. CII - Dividend Comparison

LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, less than CII's 15.28% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund		15.28%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		7.21%12.92%17.12%19.61%17.88%15.33%7.16%19.39%23.12%15.52%15.92%19.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

LBS.TO and CII have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and CII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer