LBS.TO vs. ASGI
LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) is a stock, while ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) is Industrials Equities fund managed by Aberdeen. Over the past 5 years, LBS.TO returned 39.30%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for ASGI. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LBS.TO vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LBS.TO is traded in CAD, while ASGI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASGI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 92.41% return, which is significantly higher than ASGI's 13.09% return.
LBS.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 32.16%
- YTD
- 92.41%
- 6M
- 90.38%
- 1Y
- 162.44%
- 3Y*
- 60.88%
- 5Y*
- 39.30%
- 10Y*
- 30.61%
ASGI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 33.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.01%
- 10Y*
- —
LBS.TO vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 92.41% | 55.41% | 38.56% | 10.41% | 0.97% | 65.80% | 91.46% |
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 13.09% | 37.62% | 19.59% | 11.75% | -4.83% | 18.11% | -9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBS.TO and ASGI is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBS.TO vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank
LBS.TO
ASGI
LBS.TO vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LBS.TO | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.31 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 2.43 | +4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.45 | 8.02 | +20.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LBS.TO vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, which is greater than ASGI's maximum drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and ASGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBS.TO | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.14% | -18.09% | -65.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.43% | -13.81% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.23% | -13.81% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | -15.14% | -20.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.74% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -3.91% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 4.18% | +1.55% |
Volatility
LBS.TO vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison
Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) at 7.77%. This indicates that LBS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBS.TO | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 7.77% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.15% | 17.51% | +24.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.20% | 19.84% | +25.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 17.60% | +12.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.24% | 18.36% | +20.88% |
Dividends
LBS.TO vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison
LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, less than ASGI's 11.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.33% | 10.96% | 12.84% | 8.03% | 8.25% | 6.33% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 7.21% | 12.92% | 17.12% | 19.61% | 17.88% | 15.33% | 7.16% | 19.39% | 23.12% | 15.52% | 15.92% | 19.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LBS.TO and ASGI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and ASGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer