PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LBNK.DE is traded in EUR, while XS6R.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XS6R.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNK.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than XS6R.L's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE has outperformed XS6R.L with an annualized return of 14.15%, while XS6R.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.47% annualized return.


LBNK.DE

1D
0.67%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.56%
6M
15.54%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
42.34%
5Y*
27.76%
10Y*
14.15%

XS6R.L

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
11.82%
6M
13.24%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBNK.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
7.56%76.66%32.67%26.48%1.30%37.71%-24.17%14.90%-25.93%11.91%
XS6R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
11.84%31.13%3.57%13.91%-8.79%7.75%11.65%30.63%2.12%9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNK.DE and XS6R.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2008

0.33

The correlation between LBNK.DE and XS6R.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBNK.DE
LBNK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XS6R.L
XS6R.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBNK.DEXS6R.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.07

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

9.15

-0.29

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNK.DE and XS6R.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBNK.DEXS6R.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.63

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.68

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.60

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.35

-0.29

Drawdowns

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNK.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than XS6R.L's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNK.DE and XS6R.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBNK.DEXS6R.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-34.72%

-47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-7.89%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.26%

-13.68%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-23.38%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.08%

-32.40%

-23.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-5.32%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.20%

-8.15%

-45.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.65%

+2.00%

Volatility

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) have volatilities of 5.68% and 5.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBNK.DEXS6R.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

5.70%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.02%

12.95%

+5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

14.88%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

16.40%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

17.33%

+8.01%

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBNK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XS6R.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBNK.DE vs. XS6R.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LBNK.DE nor XS6R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LBNK.DE and XS6R.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS6R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS6R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

LBNK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while XS6R.L is Utilities Equities. LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LBNK.DE and 0.20% for XS6R.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBNK.DE and XS6R.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer