PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LBNK.DE is traded in EUR, while VA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VA.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNK.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than VA.TO's 30.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE has outperformed VA.TO with an annualized return of 14.15%, while VA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.


LBNK.DE

1D
0.67%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.56%
6M
15.54%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
42.34%
5Y*
27.76%
10Y*
14.15%

VA.TO

1D
-1.30%
1M
4.50%
YTD
30.42%
6M
30.23%
1Y
49.19%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBNK.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
7.56%76.66%32.67%26.48%1.30%37.71%-24.17%14.90%-25.93%11.91%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF
30.42%16.20%8.30%11.27%-10.08%9.24%6.43%19.89%-10.72%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNK.DE and VA.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBNK.DE
LBNK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VA.TO
VA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBNK.DEVA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.54

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

17.80

-8.94

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the VA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNK.DE and VA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBNK.DEVA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.66

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.69

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.54

-0.47

Drawdowns

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNK.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than VA.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNK.DE and VA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBNK.DEVA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-31.42%

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-10.67%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.26%

-16.67%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-16.94%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.08%

-31.42%

-24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.30%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.20%

-5.71%

-47.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.72%

+1.93%

Volatility

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) have volatilities of 5.68% and 5.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBNK.DEVA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

5.92%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.02%

15.56%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

18.23%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

15.74%

+7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

16.91%

+8.43%

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBNK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBNK.DE vs. VA.TO - Dividend Comparison

LBNK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBNK.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF
1.66%2.17%2.31%2.57%3.09%2.35%2.14%2.53%2.84%1.71%1.62%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBNK.DE and VA.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

LBNK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while VA.TO is Asia Pacific Equities. LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LBNK.DE and 0.22% for VA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBNK.DE and VA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer