PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBNDX vs. LADYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNDX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than LADYX's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNDX has underperformed LADYX with an annualized return of 3.81%, while LADYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


LBNDX

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.39%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
0.17%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
3.81%
ALL TIME*
5.67%

LADYX

1D
5.35%
1M
-8.40%
6M
14.57%
YTD
18.99%
1Y
36.51%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
0.17%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
18.99%14.64%22.21%8.74%-35.92%-2.50%72.82%31.89%4.89%30.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNDX and LADYX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1997

0.55

The correlation between LBNDX and LADYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBNDX vs. LADYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LADYX
LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBNDXLADYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.86

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

6.82

-2.25

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the LADYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNDX and LADYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNDX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum LADYX drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNDX and LADYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBNDXLADYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-60.18%

+33.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-18.41%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-32.06%

+27.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-50.98%

+33.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.77%

-54.05%

+34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-14.04%

+12.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-20.06%

+16.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

5.02%

-3.95%

Volatility

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) is 0.83%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that LBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBNDXLADYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

11.46%

-10.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

25.63%

-22.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

30.40%

-26.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

28.38%

-23.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

27.57%

-22.57%

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBNDX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than LADYX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBNDX vs. LADYX - Dividend Comparison

LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, while LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%9.60%7.58%18.36%28.34%0.00%0.00%8.82%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
5.67%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBNDX and LADYX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LADYX has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to LBNDX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBNDX dropped -26.67% vs LADYX's -60.18%.

LBNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBNDX and LADYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer