LAVLX vs. LCFIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LAVLX (Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund) and LCFIX (Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund) are both mutual funds - LAVLX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LCFIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LAVLX returned 9.27%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for LCFIX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LAVLX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for LCFIX.

Performance

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund (LCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAVLX achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than LCFIX's 2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LAVLX has outperformed LCFIX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while LCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.

LAVLX

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 13.54%
• 6M: 12.08%
• 1Y: 25.14%
• 3Y*: 16.38%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

LCFIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 7.61%
• 3Y*: 3.58%
• 5Y*: -0.16%
• 10Y*: 1.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAVLX Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund	13.54%	7.28%	14.96%	15.50%	-11.02%	28.79%	2.73%	22.92%	-14.55%	7.06%
LCFIX Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund	2.12%	3.19%	1.87%	6.63%	-13.89%	2.66%	4.65%	9.54%	0.51%	6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LAVLX and LCFIX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 1985	0.03

The correlation between LAVLX and LCFIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (10 years) to 0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LAVLX vs. LCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAVLX

LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

LCFIX

LCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
LCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
LCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund (LCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAVLX	LCFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.35	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.67	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.58	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	2.36	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.68	8.22	+4.46

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the LCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAVLX and LCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than LCFIX's maximum drawdown of -22.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAVLX and LCFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAVLX	LCFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.58%	-22.34%	-38.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-3.24%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	-6.95%	-13.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-19.85%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.16%	-19.85%	-22.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.81%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-3.30%	-4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	0.93%	+1.16%

Volatility

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund (LCFIX) at 0.90%. This indicates that LAVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAVLX	LCFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	0.90%	+3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	2.49%	+6.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	3.25%	+9.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	4.81%	+12.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.59%	4.90%	+14.69%

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAVLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than LCFIX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAVLX vs. LCFIX - Dividend Comparison

LAVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than LCFIX's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAVLX Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund	6.20%	7.04%	9.70%	1.23%	8.40%	8.51%	1.19%	3.19%	6.55%	2.67%	0.60%	0.79%
LCFIX Lord Abbett California Tax Free Fund	3.54%	4.07%	3.04%	2.77%	2.02%	2.19%	2.40%	3.01%	3.09%	3.05%	3.35%	3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAVLX and LCFIX in my portfolio?

LAVLX and LCFIX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAVLX or LCFIX?

LAVLX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to LCFIX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAVLX dropped -60.58% vs LCFIX's -22.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.