LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L
LAUU.L (Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - LAUU.L tracks the MSCI Australia NR USD while PAXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LAUU.L returned 5.08%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PAXG.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LAUU.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.
Performance
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LAUU.L is traded in USD, while PAXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAUU.L achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than PAXG.L's 8.57% return.
LAUU.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXG.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 12.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAUU.L Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist | 8.08% | 17.36% | 1.39% | 11.94% | -7.97% | 8.38% | 11.35% | 21.36% | -11.21% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 8.57% | 16.83% | -0.21% | 2.59% | -10.69% | -1.18% | 4.58% | 8.02% | -8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAUU.L and PAXG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, LAUU.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Financial Services
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Basic Materials
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Industrials
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Real Estate
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Healthcare
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Energy
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Communication Services
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Consumer Defensive
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Technology
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Utilities
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LAUU.L
PAXG.L
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAUU.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 3.96 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAUU.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.06 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.32 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAUU.L drawdown since its inception was -45.03%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAUU.L and PAXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAUU.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.03% | -37.04% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -9.02% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.29% | -23.28% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -29.56% | +4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -3.57% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -11.15% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 3.18% | +0.31% |
Volatility
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that LAUU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAUU.L | PAXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 4.10% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 10.91% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 13.37% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 21.69% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 26.87% | -4.74% |
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAUU.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
LAUU.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison
LAUU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than PAXG.L's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAUU.L Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.40% | 2.60% | 3.90% | 3.13% | 4.48% | 2.86% | 1.94% | 3.50% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAUU.L and PAXG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LAUU.L.
LAUU.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LAUU.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.
Find the right allocation for LAUU.L and PAXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer