PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LAUU.L (Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - LAUU.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LAUU.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.

Performance

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LAUU.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

LAUU.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
8.08%
6M
9.74%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
—

MWRD.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist		8.08%17.36%1.39%11.94%-7.97%8.38%11.35%21.36%-11.21%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World		0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LAUU.L and MWRD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.60

The correlation between LAUU.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LAUU.L
MWRD.L

Financial Services

34.8%
14.7%

Basic Materials

24.7%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
10.5%

Industrials

6.3%
10.6%

Real Estate

5.8%
2.4%

Healthcare

5.5%
12.4%

Energy

5.0%
4.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.7%

Technology

2.5%
24.7%

Utilities

1.5%
2.4%

Financial Services

LAUU.L
34.8%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Basic Materials

LAUU.L
24.7%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LAUU.L
6.7%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Industrials

LAUU.L
6.3%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Real Estate

LAUU.L
5.8%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Healthcare

LAUU.L
5.5%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Energy

LAUU.L
5.0%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Communication Services

LAUU.L
3.7%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

LAUU.L
3.6%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Technology

LAUU.L
2.5%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Utilities

LAUU.L
1.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist

Amundi Index MSCI World

Often compared with LAUU.L:
LAUU.L vs. SPYLAUU.L vs. ^NDXLAUU.L vs. TSLYLAUU.L vs. VUSA.LLAUU.L vs. IVVLAUU.L vs. JEPILAUU.L vs. YMAX
Often compared with MWRD.L:
MWRD.L vs. BRK-BMWRD.L vs. IWDA.ASMWRD.L vs. URTHMWRD.L vs. SWDA.LMWRD.L vs. JEPIMWRD.L vs. ACWIMWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE

Return for Risk

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LAUU.L
LAUU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LAUU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAUU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist (LAUU.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LAUU.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.94

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.48

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LAUU.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

—

—

Drawdowns

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LAUU.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.03%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.38%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

—

—

Volatility

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LAUU.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.44%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

—

—

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAUU.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAUU.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

LAUU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while MWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LAUU.L
Lyxor Australia (S&P/ASX 200) UCITS ETF - Dist		2.40%2.60%3.90%3.13%4.48%2.86%1.94%3.50%3.96%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

LAUU.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LAUU.L.

LAUU.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. LAUU.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LAUU.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAUU.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer