LAPR vs. JULJ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) and JULJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LAPR returned 6.48% vs 5.47% for JULJ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

LAPR vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAPR achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than JULJ's 1.96% return.

LAPR

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 3.34%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 6.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULJ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAPR vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	3.34%	5.81%	4.66%
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	1.96%	5.91%	4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LAPR and JULJ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.58

The correlation between LAPR and JULJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LAPR vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAPR

LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 99
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

JULJ

JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 97
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAPR vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAPR	JULJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.28	3.56	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.21	5.94	+5.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.71	1.85	+0.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	18.31	9.07	+9.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	104.51	47.05	+57.45

LAPR vs. JULJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAPR Sharpe Ratio is 5.28, which is higher than the JULJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAPR and JULJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAPR vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAPR drawdown since its inception was -3.81%, which is greater than JULJ's maximum drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPR and JULJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAPR	JULJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-3.62%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.36%	-0.61%	+0.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.02%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-0.10%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.06%	0.12%	-0.06%

Volatility

LAPR vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) at 0.23%. This indicates that LAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAPR	JULJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.23%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.05%	0.94%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25%	1.54%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.27%	3.05%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.27%	3.05%	+0.22%

LAPR vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LAPR and JULJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

LAPR vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison

LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than JULJ's 5.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	5.66%	5.76%	5.96%	3.21%
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	5.53%	5.40%	4.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAPR and JULJ in my portfolio?

LAPR and JULJ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAPR or JULJ?

LAPR has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to JULJ (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPR dropped -3.81% vs JULJ's -3.62%.

Which ETF is better, LAPR or JULJ?

On 1-year performance, LAPR leads with 6.48% vs 5.47% for JULJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JULJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LAPR or JULJ?

Over the 1-year period, LAPR has performed better with a 6.48% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LAPR or JULJ?

LAPR and JULJ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LAPR or JULJ?

JULJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 5.53% for LAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.28 vs 3.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.