LAPIX vs. TGRNX
LAPIX (Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund) and TGRNX (TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, LAPIX returned 0.51%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TGRNX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LAPIX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for TGRNX.
Performance
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAPIX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than TGRNX's 0.68% return.
LAPIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
TGRNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- —
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAPIX Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.50% | 7.63% | 3.12% | 6.31% | -14.72% | 0.29% | 7.43% | 10.10% | 0.84% |
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund | 0.68% | 6.76% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -13.43% | -0.60% | 8.57% | 9.15% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAPIX and TGRNX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between LAPIX and TGRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAPIX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank
LAPIX
TGRNX
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAPIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.20 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 7.23 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAPIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.73 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAPIX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than TGRNX's maximum drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPIX and TGRNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAPIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -17.85% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -2.47% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.41% | -3.99% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -17.85% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.78% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -5.23% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.75% | +0.26% |
Volatility
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) at 1.06%. This indicates that LAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAPIX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 1.06% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.31% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91% | 3.15% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 4.84% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 4.82% | -0.17% |
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAPIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRNX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LAPIX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison
LAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than TGRNX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAPIX Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund | 5.18% | 5.20% | 5.05% | 4.32% | 2.95% | 2.42% | 4.45% | 4.00% | 4.15% | 2.57% | 0.65% |
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund | 4.29% | 4.31% | 4.48% | 3.30% | 2.69% | 2.76% | 4.20% | 4.38% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, LAPIX and TGRNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LAPIX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to TGRNX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPIX dropped -18.94% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.
TGRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAPIX and TGRNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer