LAMYX vs. SVPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX).
LAMYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 27, 2001. SVPFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 28, 2021.
Performance
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund | -3.24% | 16.44% | 22.61% | 16.66% | -13.29% | 18.02% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 0.87% | 4.19% | 3.82% | 5.30% | -4.37% | 0.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAMYX achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than SVPFX's 0.87% return.
LAMYX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
SVPFX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LAMYX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank
LAMYX
SVPFX
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAMYX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.44 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 0.61 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.57 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 3.10 | +3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAMYX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.44 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.38 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between LAMYX and SVPFX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison
LAMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than SVPFX's 2.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund | 5.16% | 5.21% | 5.36% | 1.57% | 6.06% | 8.03% | 3.54% | 6.06% | 9.59% | 8.18% | 8.95% | 9.68% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 2.49% | 1.83% | 4.37% | 4.29% | 0.76% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMYX and SVPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAMYX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.55% | -6.37% | -34.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -5.22% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -0.45% | -7.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -1.99% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 0.98% | +1.20% |
Volatility
LAMYX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.87%. This indicates that LAMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LAMYX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 0.87% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 1.37% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 8.02% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 5.60% | +9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 5.60% | +11.31% |