LAMYX vs. RESGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LAMYX (Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LAMYX returned 13.25%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LAMYX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAMYX achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAMYX having a 13.25% annualized return and RESGX not far behind at 13.16%.

LAMYX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 21.67%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: 13.25%

RESGX

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: 10.96%
• YTD: 27.79%
• 6M: 28.15%
• 1Y: 44.13%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund	7.90%	16.44%	22.61%	16.66%	-13.29%	25.76%	15.80%	26.91%	-4.52%	19.42%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	27.79%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	26.58%	9.57%	24.25%	-6.47%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LAMYX and RESGX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.88

The correlation between LAMYX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LAMYX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAMYX

LAMYX Risk / Return Rank: 58
LAMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LAMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LAMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LAMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LAMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 91
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAMYX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	3.21	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	4.33	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.56	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	5.89	-2.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.91	21.39	-8.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAMYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAMYX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAMYX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	3.21	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.61	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.71	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.72	-0.04

Drawdowns

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMYX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAMYX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.55%	-37.80%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-7.84%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.50%	-20.50%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-23.58%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.47%	-37.80%	+4.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-5.00%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	2.15%	-0.41%

Volatility

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) is 2.62%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that LAMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAMYX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	5.45%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	11.00%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.24%	14.41%	-4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	17.26%	-1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	18.71%	-1.77%

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAMYX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

LAMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund	4.63%	5.21%	5.36%	1.57%	6.06%	8.03%	3.54%	6.06%	9.59%	8.18%	8.95%	9.68%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	6.52%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAMYX and RESGX in my portfolio?

LAMYX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAMYX or RESGX?

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to LAMYX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAMYX dropped -40.55% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.