LAMYX vs. NWAUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX).
LAMYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 27, 2001. NWAUX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Jan 24, 2021.
Performance
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund | -3.24% | 16.44% | 22.61% | 16.66% | -13.29% | 24.11% |
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund | 9.70% | -4.92% | 27.90% | 18.30% | -3.23% | 22.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAMYX achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.70% return.
LAMYX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
NWAUX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LAMYX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank
LAMYX
NWAUX
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAMYX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.49 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 0.73 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.10 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.58 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 1.36 | +5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAMYX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.49 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.83 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between LAMYX and NWAUX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison
LAMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than NWAUX's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund | 5.16% | 5.21% | 5.36% | 1.57% | 6.06% | 8.03% | 3.54% | 6.06% | 9.59% | 8.18% | 8.95% | 9.68% |
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund | 4.69% | 4.35% | 13.58% | 0.40% | 1.93% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMYX and NWAUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAMYX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.55% | -21.07% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -8.87% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -21.07% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -7.03% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -6.85% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 3.83% | -1.65% |
Volatility
LAMYX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that LAMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LAMYX | NWAUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 2.74% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 7.29% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 12.58% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 16.10% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 16.05% | +0.86% |