PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAMYX vs. LSYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAMYX achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly higher than LSYAX's 2.47% return.


LAMYX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.90%
6M
8.44%
1Y
21.67%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
13.25%

LSYAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.80%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LAMYX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund
7.90%16.44%22.61%16.66%-13.29%25.76%34.00%
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
2.47%7.50%8.46%10.60%-7.21%4.50%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LAMYX and LSYAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.52

The correlation between LAMYX and LSYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAMYX vs. LSYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAMYX
LAMYX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LAMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LAMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LSYAX
LSYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LSYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LSYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAMYXLSYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.62

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.08

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.91

15.02

-2.10

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAMYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the LSYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAMYX and LSYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAMYXLSYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.48

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.07

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.54

-0.87

Drawdowns

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than LSYAX's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMYX and LSYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAMYXLSYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-10.79%

-29.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-2.84%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-5.30%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-10.79%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-1.86%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.58%

+1.16%

Volatility

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) at 0.98%. This indicates that LAMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAMYXLSYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

0.98%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

2.82%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.24%

3.53%

+6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

4.29%

+11.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

4.20%

+12.74%

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than LSYAX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAMYX vs. LSYAX - Dividend Comparison

LAMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than LSYAX's 7.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAMYX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund
4.63%5.21%5.36%1.57%6.06%8.03%3.54%6.06%9.59%8.18%8.95%9.68%
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
7.85%7.91%8.01%6.38%4.86%5.77%4.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAMYX and LSYAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAMYX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to LSYAX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAMYX dropped -40.55% vs LSYAX's -10.79%.

LSYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAMYX and LSYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer