LAMYX vs. FGJEX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX).

LAMYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 27, 2001. FGJEX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

LAMYX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LAMYX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund	-3.24%	20.69%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	-2.99%	24.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAMYX achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than FGJEX's -2.99% return.

LAMYX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -6.99%
• YTD: -3.24%
• 6M: -1.14%
• 1Y: 15.26%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

FGJEX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -7.13%
• YTD: -2.99%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAMYX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.

LAMYX

Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund

FGJEX

Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

LAMYX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAMYX

LAMYX Risk / Return Rank: 63
LAMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LAMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LAMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LAMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LAMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAMYX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund (LAMYX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAMYX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAMYX	FGJEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	2.09	-1.45

Correlation

The correlation between LAMYX and FGJEX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LAMYX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison

LAMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than FGJEX's 9.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAMYX Lord Abbett Dividend Growth Fund	5.16%	5.21%	5.36%	1.57%	6.06%	8.03%	3.54%	6.06%	9.59%	8.18%	8.95%	9.68%
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z	9.88%	9.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LAMYX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAMYX and FGJEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAMYX	FGJEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.55%	-8.32%	-32.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.58%	-8.32%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-1.05%	-4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LAMYX	FGJEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	10.78%	+4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	10.78%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	10.78%	+6.13%