LALT vs. NUG
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and NUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LALT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while NUG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NUG.
Performance
LALT vs. NUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than NUG's -57.59% return.
LALT
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUG
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- -34.47%
- YTD
- -57.59%
- 6M
- -61.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LALT vs. NUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 10.70% | 0.72% |
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | -57.59% | 11.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and NUG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. NUG — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
NUG
LALT vs. NUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALT | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.28 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.62 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALT | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | -0.94 | +2.56 |
Drawdowns
LALT vs. NUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum NUG drawdown of -65.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and NUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -65.69% | +58.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -65.69% | +64.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -29.27% | +28.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
LALT vs. NUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 80.36% | -73.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 80.36% | -74.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 80.36% | -74.58% |
LALT vs. NUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than NUG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. NUG - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while NUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.68% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% |
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and NUG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for NUG.
LALT is categorized as Global Allocation, while NUG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.75% for NUG.
Find the right allocation for LALT and NUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer