LALT vs. AIRR
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LALT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). LALT is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LALT returned 10.48%/yr vs 37.10%/yr for AIRR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
LALT vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return.
LALT
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 31.77%
- 6M
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 65.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.10%
- 5Y*
- 25.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.89%
LALT vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 10.70% | 10.79% | 8.77% | 0.88% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.77% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 16.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and AIRR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.30 |
The correlation between LALT and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LALT vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LALT
AIRR
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
LALT
AIRR
Technology
LALT
AIRR
Consumer Cyclical
LALT
AIRR
-
Industrials
LALT
AIRR
Healthcare
LALT
AIRR
-
Energy
LALT
AIRR
Consumer Defensive
LALT
AIRR
-
Communication Services
LALT
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
LALT
AIRR
-
Real Estate
LALT
AIRR
-
Utilities
LALT
AIRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
AIRR
LALT vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALT | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.28 | 2.61 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.62 | 3.37 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.41 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 5.05 | +2.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.25 | 18.68 | +11.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALT | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | 2.61 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.67 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
LALT vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -42.37% | +35.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -13.09% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -27.95% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.86% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -7.43% | +6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 3.53% | -2.79% |
Volatility
LALT vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) is 1.23%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that LALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 7.87% | -6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 19.82% | -14.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 25.40% | -18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 25.29% | -19.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 26.29% | -20.51% |
LALT vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.68% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and AIRR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to LALT (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALT dropped -6.97% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 3-year performance, AIRR leads with 37.10% vs 10.48% for LALT. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 37.10% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
LALT is categorized as Global Allocation, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.70% for AIRR.
LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LALT and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer