LALDX vs. DFCFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LALDX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) and DFCFX (DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, LALDX returned 2.47%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for DFCFX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALDX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DFCFX.

Performance

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) and DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LALDX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than DFCFX's 1.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LALDX having a 2.47% annualized return and DFCFX not far ahead at 2.48%.

LALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

DFCFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 2.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.96%	5.70%	4.48%	4.76%	-5.48%	1.17%	2.98%	5.42%	1.24%	2.30%
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio	1.52%	2.28%	5.33%	4.92%	-3.28%	8.60%	0.57%	2.65%	1.78%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LALDX and DFCFX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1996	0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between LALDX and DFCFX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LALDX vs. DFCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LALDX

LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 67
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

DFCFX

DFCFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
DFCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
DFCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DFCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DFCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) and DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LALDX	DFCFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.50	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.88	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	3.70	-2.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	2.94	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	10.64	+3.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LALDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the DFCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LALDX and DFCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LALDX	DFCFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.50	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.87	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	0.80	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	1.35	-0.06

Drawdowns

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LALDX drawdown since its inception was -10.58%, which is greater than DFCFX's maximum drawdown of -4.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALDX and DFCFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LALDX	DFCFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-4.27%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-1.03%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-1.33%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.60%	-4.27%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.67%	-4.27%	-5.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-0.26%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.28%	+0.03%

Volatility

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) at 0.17%. This indicates that LALDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LALDX	DFCFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.17%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.91%	0.40%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45%	1.21%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.70%	4.39%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.61%	3.13%	-0.52%

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LALDX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCFX's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

LALDX vs. DFCFX - Dividend Comparison

LALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than DFCFX's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio	2.93%	2.16%	4.90%	3.43%	1.32%	8.29%	0.67%	2.22%	1.87%	1.22%	0.79%	0.53%
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	4.95%	5.01%	4.11%	4.09%	2.42%	2.37%	2.88%	3.59%	3.88%	3.71%	3.95%	3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LALDX and DFCFX in my portfolio?

LALDX and DFCFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LALDX or DFCFX?

LALDX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to DFCFX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALDX dropped -10.58% vs DFCFX's -4.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.