PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAIEX vs. LUBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Opportunities Fund (LAIEX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAIEX achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than LUBYX's 1.34% return.


LAIEX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.68%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.22%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
8.44%

LUBYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.71%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAIEX
Lord Abbett International Opportunities Fund
19.04%23.98%0.22%14.75%-20.35%9.51%14.29%21.25%-23.77%37.96%
LUBYX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund
1.34%4.99%5.70%5.60%-0.38%0.07%1.27%3.00%2.09%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LAIEX and LUBYX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2016

0.10

The correlation between LAIEX and LUBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAIEX vs. LUBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAIEX
LAIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LAIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LAIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBYX
LUBYX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LUBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Opportunities Fund (LAIEX) and Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAIEXLUBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

3.35

-2.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

10.85

-8.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

50.25

-43.22

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the LUBYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAIEX and LUBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAIEX drawdown since its inception was -71.83%, which is greater than LUBYX's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAIEX and LUBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAIEXLUBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.83%

-2.59%

-69.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-0.40%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.79%

-0.50%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.79%

-1.86%

-34.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-0.10%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.57%

-0.17%

-22.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

0.09%

+3.50%

Volatility

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett International Opportunities Fund (LAIEX) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) at 0.42%. This indicates that LAIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAIEXLUBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

0.42%

+7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

0.96%

+13.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

1.38%

+15.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

1.38%

+14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

1.12%

+15.24%

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAIEX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBYX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAIEX vs. LUBYX - Dividend Comparison

LAIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than LUBYX's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAIEX
Lord Abbett International Opportunities Fund
1.33%1.59%1.90%1.51%1.69%2.33%0.00%1.23%12.50%4.38%0.71%4.36%
LUBYX
Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund
4.41%4.66%4.72%4.10%1.33%0.57%1.16%2.55%2.27%0.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAIEX and LUBYX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAIEX has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to LUBYX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAIEX dropped -71.83% vs LUBYX's -2.59%.

LUBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAIEX and LUBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer